11th Post - Letter to the DNI about EO 13526 and how Sec. 1.7 Applies to my FOIA Request

 IN BOLD ARE MY RESPONSES TO EO 13526 AND THE REASONS YOU SHOULD DECLASSIFY MY FOIA AGAINST MY NAME SEC. 1.7 CLEARLY IS BEING MET HERE IN ALL ASPECTS REGARDING ACCESS TO MY FOIA. ESPECIALLY YOUR DATE/S IN YOUR DOCUMENT/S BEING WITHHELD FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN WHO HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW. THE PUBLIC INTEREST IS AT HEART HERE, TO HELP US ALL BETTER UNDERSTAND EXACTLY HOW OUR 3 LETTER AGENCIES ARE REALLY DOING FOR US!?

Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to: (1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error; (THE EXACT DATE OF THE CREATION OF THE DOCUMENT/S IS IN QUESTION HERE LEADING TO SUSPICION VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW HAVE OCCURED IN CREATING NUMEROUS DOCUMENT/S WHICH IS ALSO INEFFICENT) (2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency; (THE CIA IS OBVIOUSLY THE MAIN AGENCY HOLDING THE INFORMATION BUT IT ALSO SUSPECTED THE NEWLY FORMED CIO COULD BE ANOTHER AGENCY WITHHOLDING THE DOCUMENT/S FOUND IN S. 3035 IF FOREIGN AGENCIES ARE WITHHOLDING THE DOCUMENT/S AND THE DATE/S ARE SKEWED THEN OBVIOUSLY THERES A PROBLEM WITH SAID ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING THAT WILL LEAD TO EMBARASSMENT) (3) restrain competition; or (4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security. (I'M A PRIVATE CITIZEN WHO IS GOOD PERSON, I AM NOT A FIGURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY RISK HERE! I AM A BASIC PRIVATE NATURAL CITIZEN BORN IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MY NAME IS NOT A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY ON ANY LEVEL/S HERE. IF SOMEONE ELSE IS SLANDERING MY NAME AND THEIR DOCUMENTS HAVE SKEWED DATES *WHICH I'M SURE THEY DO* THAT SHOULD BE YOUR PRIORITY TO SOLVE HERE AND UNDERSTAND HOW/WHY SOMEONE IS DOING THIS TO ME!) (b) Basic scientific research information not clearly related to the national security shall not be classified. (THIS IS PUBLIC INTEREST DOCUMENT AT THIS POINT IN TIME AND PUBLIC HAS THE RIGHT TO KNOW, IF MY FOIA HAS SOME ELEMENT OF *SCIENTIC RESEARCH* TO IT THEN IT SAYS CLEARLY SHALL NOT BE CLASSIFIED!!) (c) Information may not be reclassified after declassification and release to the public under proper authority unless: (1) the reclassification is personally approved in writing by the agency head based on a document-by-document determination by the agency that reclassification is required to prevent significant and demonstrable damage to the national security; (I'M SURE YOUR USING THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF SECURITY POSSIBLE, THERE PROBABLY IS NO RECLASSIFICATION AT THIS POINT, SEE 1.7 (1) (2) the information may be reasonably recovered without bringing undue attention to the information; (THIS IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST NO MATTER WHAT ANYBODY SAYS IN YOUR REALM OF INFORMATION HANDLING) (3) the reclassification action is reported promptly to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (National Security Advisor) and the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office; and (GET THE PRESIDENT BIDEN INVOLVED, IT'S PRETTY APPAIRENT TRUMP HAS PLAYED A MAJOR ROLE IN THIS FOIA TO BEGIN WITH IN MEDDLING WITH MY LIFE AND CREATING *LEGAL DOCUMENTS* PROBABLY FROM SOURCES LIKE LEXUSNEXUS SEE HIS FEC.GOV PROFILE AND SUBSCRIPTIONS ITS PUBLIC INFORMATION!) (4) for documents in the physical and legal custody of the National Archives and Records Administration (National Archives) that have been available for public use, the agency head has, after making the determinations required by this paragraph, notified the Archivist of the United States (Archivist), who shall suspend public access pending approval of the reclassification action by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office. Any such decision by the Director may be appealed by the agency head to the President through the National Security Advisor. Public access shall remain suspended pending a prompt decision on the appeal. (LETS JUST APPEAL THIS NOW! THE PUBLIC INTEREST OUTWEIGHS ANY LEGAL CUSTODY OF THIS FOIA DOCUMENT SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) FOLLOW YOUR OWN RULES YOU HAVE CREATED IN THIS MONSTER DOCUMENT TO HIDE WHATEVER SCANDLE/S YOUR RUNNING HERE AND DEFAMATING MY NAME OVER! THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING WITHIN OUR AGENCIES ESPECIALLY IF 1.7 (2) ITS GOING TO EMBARASS THEM!) (d) Information that has not previously been disclosed to the public under proper authority may be classified or reclassified after an agency has received a request for it under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2204(c)(1), the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), or the mandatory review provisions of section 3.5 of this order only if such classification meets the requirements of this order and is accomplished on a document-by-document basis with the personal participation or under the direction of the agency head, the deputy agency head, or the senior agency official designated under section 5.4 of this order. The requirements in this paragraph also apply to those situations in which information has been declassified in accordance with a specific date or event determined by an original classification authority in accordance with section 1.5 of this order. (e) Compilations of items of information that are individually unclassified may be classified if the compiled information reveals an additional association or relationship that: (I NEVER GOT MY 9 FOIA EXEMPTIONS OR NARA EXPLINATION WITHIN THE 10 DAY WINDOW THAT WAS LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO ME, IT IS MY RIGHT TO GET THAT INFORMATION BUT OBVIOUSLY THAT WAS VIOLATED WITHIN THE CIA'S OWN SET OF RULES ON THEIR BASICALLY FAQ PAGE WEBSITE, THIS IS PUBLIC INFORMATION AND THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC IS AT HEART HERE, SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (1) meets the standards for classification under this order; and (2) is not otherwise revealed in the individual items of information. Sec. 1.8. Classification Challenges. (a) Authorized holders of information who, in good faith, believe that its classification status is improper are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification status of the information in accordance with agency procedures established under paragraph (I'M A PRIVATE CITIZEN HOW ON EARTH DO I HAVE A CLASSIFICATION IN YOUR SYSTEMS THAT HOLD SOME OF THE HIGHEST PROTECTIONS IN THE NATION!? OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT HERE, CHECK YOUR DATE/S SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (b) of this section. (b) In accordance with implementing directives issued pursuant to this order, an agency head or senior agency official shall establish procedures under which authorized holders of information, including authorized holders outside the classifying agency, are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification of information that they believe is improperly classified or unclassified. These procedures shall ensure that: (I AM SURE YOU HAVE INDIVIDUALS WHO DO BELIEVE THIS IS IMPROPERLY CLASSIFED MATERIAL/S JUST ASK AROUND, ASK NAND MULCHANDANI AT THE IT DEPARTMENT IN THE CIA *POSSIBLY CIO AS WELL, DEPENDING ON HOW FAR ALONG THE DEVELOPMENT OF THAT ORGINIZATION IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW* FOUND HIS LITTLE GEM ONLINE WITH LINKEDIN AND QUICK GOOGLE SEARCH *CIA IT GUY*. I'VE ALREADY EMAILED THE CIA AND HIM ABOUT METHODS THAT COULD HAPPEN TO TRY AND PROTECT ME AND EXPOSE THESE FALSIFIED ILLEGALLY CREATED/MODIFIED DOCUMENT/S BEING WITHHELD FROM ME, CHECK YOUR FREAKING DATES SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (1) individuals are not subject to retribution for bringing such actions; (2) an opportunity is provided for review by an impartial official or panel; and (I AM CONFIDENT THE IT GUY IS THE RIGHT PERSON FOR THE JOB HERE, THEY HAVE ACCESS TO THE LOGS/DOCUMENT/S AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF SECURITY, IF THEY KNOW ABOUT SEC 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) IN MIND THEN OBVIOIUSLY THEY WILL MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE HERE BECAUSE THE PUBLIC INTEREST OUTWEIGHS CONCELMENT) (3) individuals are advised of their right to appeal agency decisions to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (Panel) established by section 5.3 of this order. (I HAVE ALREADY APPEALED THE CIA DECISION TO DENY ME MY FOIA, CUT TO THE CHASE AND RELEASE THE INFORMATION FOR IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC TO KNOW ABOUT AND AT THE HEART OF THIS MATTER) (c) Documents required to be submitted for prepublication review or other administrative process pursuant to an approved nondisclosure agreement are not covered by this section. (e) ‘‘Automatic declassification’’ means the declassification of information based solely upon: (SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (1) the occurrence of a specific date or event as determined by the original classification authority; or (SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (2) the expiration of a maximum time frame for duration of classification established under this order.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (s) ‘‘Foreign government information’’ means: (SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (1) information provided to the United States Government by a foreign government or governments, an international organization of governments, or any element thereof, with the expectation that the information, the source of the information, or both, are to be held in confidence; (SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (2) information produced by the United States Government pursuant to or as a result of a joint arrangement with a foreign government or governments, or an international organization of governments, or any element thereof, requiring that the information, the arrangement, or both, are to be held in confidence; or (3) information received and treated as ‘‘foreign government information’’ under the terms of a predecessor order.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (t) ‘‘Information’’ means any knowledge that can be communicated or documentary material, regardless of its physical form or characteristics, that is owned by, is produced by or for, or is under the control of the United States Government.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (w) ‘‘Integrity’’ means the state that exists when information is unchanged from its source and has not been accidentally or intentionally modified, altered, or destroyed.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (gg) ‘‘Original classification authority’’ means an individual authorized in writing, either by the President, the Vice President or by agency heads or other officials designated by the President, to classify information in the first instance. (SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (nn) ‘‘Source document’’ means an existing document that contains classified information that is incorporated, paraphrased, restated, or generated in new form into a new document.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (oo) ‘‘Special access program’’ means a program established for a specific class of classified information that imposes safeguarding and access requirements that exceed those normally required for information at the same classification level.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) THIS SHOULD NOT BE A SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM, I AM NOT TO BE TREATED LIKE SOME SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM IF THAT'S THE VERBAGE YOUR GOING TO USE BACK AT ME WITH CONFIRMING OR DENYING ITS SPECIAL ACCESS, IM CALLING THIS OUT RIGHT NOW) (pp) ‘‘Systematic declassification review’’ means the review for declassification of classified information contained in records that have been determined by the Archivist to have permanent historical value in accordance with title 44, United States Code.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (c) The Attorney General, upon request by the head of an agency or the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, shall render an interpretation of this order with respect to any question arising in the course of its administration. (SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) (g) Executive Order 12958 of April 17, 1995, and amendments thereto, including Executive Order 13292 of March 25, 2003, are hereby revoked as of the effective date of this order.(SEE 1.7 (1) (2) (3) (4) (B) THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. I HOPE THE PUBLIC GETS WHAT IT WANTS AND THE INFORMATION WE NEED HERE BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING IS CORRUPTED HERE AND WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHERE THAT CORRUPTION IS COMING FROM! KEENAN MICHAEL STORBECK